Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked4
VS
Quail, cooked
Quail, cooked3

Chicken back, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Quail, cooked for less sodium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    227 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    25.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    14.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.6 g
    3.96 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    52 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    216 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    4.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Quail, cooked · Foodatron