Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked3
VS
Turkey breast, cooked Leader
Turkey breast, cooked4

Turkey breast, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Turkey breast, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Turkey breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.19 g
    30.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    2.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    0.59 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    99 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    249 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey breast, cooked · Foodatron