Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked5
VS
Turkey breast, raw
Turkey breast, raw3

Chicken back, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Turkey breast, raw: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Turkey breast, raw for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    114 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    23.66 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.14 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.05 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    1.48 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    0.29 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    113 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    242 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    0.73 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey breast, raw · Foodatron