Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked5
VS
Turkey breast with skin, roasted
Turkey breast with skin, roasted2

Chicken back, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Turkey breast with skin, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey breast with skin, roasted for less saturated fat and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    126 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    22.16 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    3.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    0.98 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    397 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    248 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.39 mg
    0.66 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey breast with skin, roasted · Foodatron