Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked2
VS
Turkey drumstick, cooked Leader
Turkey drumstick, cooked5

Turkey drumstick, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Turkey drumstick, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Turkey drumstick, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    197 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.19 g
    28.21 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    9.37 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    2.31 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    112 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    254 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    16 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    1.58 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey drumstick, cooked · Foodatron