Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked Leader
Chicken back, cooked4
VS
Turkey giblets, cooked
Turkey giblets, cooked3

Chicken back, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Chicken back, cooked: 100 g · Turkey giblets, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken back, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Turkey giblets, cooked for less saturated fat, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    173 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    26.44 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    6.61 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    1.73 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    117 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN237 mg
    177 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    18 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    3.39 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey giblets, cooked · Foodatron