Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked4
VS
Turkey sausage, cooked
Turkey sausage, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey sausage, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    196 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    23.89 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    10.44 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    2.27 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    665 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    298 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    22 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    1.49 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey sausage, cooked · Foodatron