Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked3
VS
Turkey thigh, cooked Leader
Turkey thigh, cooked4

Turkey thigh, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Turkey thigh, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Turkey thigh, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    159 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    25.14 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.46 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    6.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    2.02 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN96 mg
    104 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    296 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    1.59 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken back, cooked vs Turkey thigh, cooked · Foodatron