Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken back, cooked
Chicken back, cooked1
VS
Turkey wing, cooked Leader
Turkey wing, cooked5

Turkey wing, cooked leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Turkey wing, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken back, cooked for more protein.

Pick Turkey wing, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, calcium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    239 kcal
    229 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.19 g
    27.38 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    13.16 g
    12.43 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.6 g
    3.39 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    96 mg
    61 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    237 mg
    266 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    24 mg
    24 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.39 mg
    1.46 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.