Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked4
VS
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw3

Chicken breast, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    120 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    22.5 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    2.62 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.01 g
    0.56 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    45 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    334 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    5 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.37 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    28 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken breast, raw · Foodatron