Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked3
VS
Chicken gizzards, cooked Leader
Chicken gizzards, cooked4

Chicken gizzards, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken gizzards, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken gizzards, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    154 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    30.39 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    2.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.01 g
    0.67 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    56 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    179 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    17 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    3.19 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken gizzards, cooked · Foodatron