Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked4
VS
Chicken hearts, cooked
Chicken hearts, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Chicken breast, cooked: 100 g · Chicken hearts, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken hearts, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    185 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    26.41 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    7.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    2.26 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    48 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    132 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    9.03 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken hearts, cooked · Foodatron