Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked4
VS
Chicken hearts, cooked
Chicken hearts, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken hearts, cooked for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN18.8 g
    14.28 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.05 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    2.16 g
    4.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.61 g
    1.22 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    44.85 mg
    25.95 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN155.15 mg
    71.35 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    9.09 mg
    10.27 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.63 mg
    4.88 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN17.58 mg
    10.81 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.97 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken hearts, cooked · Foodatron