Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked5
VS
Chicken, meat and skin, roasted
Chicken, meat and skin, roasted1

Chicken breast, cooked leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken, meat and skin, roasted for more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, calcium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    27.3 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    13.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.79 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN74 mg
    82 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    223 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    1.26 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken, meat and skin, roasted · Foodatron