Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked7
VS
Chicken wing, raw
Chicken wing, raw0

Chicken breast, cooked leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    191 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    17.52 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    12.85 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.54 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN74 mg
    84 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    187 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.46 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    16 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chicken wing, raw · Foodatron