Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked2
VS
Chickpeas, cooked Leader
Chickpeas, cooked8

Chickpeas, cooked leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein and less sugar.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    164 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    8.86 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    27.42 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    7.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.8 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    2.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.01 g
    0.27 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    7 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    291 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    2.89 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29 mg
    48 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chickpeas, cooked · Foodatron