Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked3
VS
Chinook salmon, cooked Leader
Chinook salmon, cooked5

Chinook salmon, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chinook salmon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more iron.

Pick Chinook salmon, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    231 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    25.72 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    13.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.21 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    505 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.91 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29 mg
    122 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Chinook salmon, cooked · Foodatron