Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked6
VS
Cornish game hen with skin, roasted
Cornish game hen with skin, roasted2

Chicken breast, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Cornish game hen with skin, roasted for less sodium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN18.8 g
    8.6 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.16 g
    7.03 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.61 g
    1.95 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    44.85 mg
    24.71 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN155.15 mg
    94.59 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.09 mg
    5.02 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.63 mg
    0.35 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN17.58 mg
    6.95 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.19 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Cornish game hen with skin, roasted · Foodatron