Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked4
VS
Duck breast, cooked
Duck breast, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Duck breast, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    123 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    19.85 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    4.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    1.32 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    57 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    268 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    4.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    6.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Duck breast, cooked · Foodatron