Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked2
VS
Pheasant, cooked Leader
Pheasant, cooked6

Pheasant, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Chicken breast, cooked: 100 g · Pheasant, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Pheasant, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Pick Pheasant, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    31.02 g
    32.4 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    12.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.91 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    43 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    271 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    16 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    1.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Pheasant, cooked · Foodatron