Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked4
VS
Pork chop, cooked
Pork chop, cooked3

Chicken breast, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Chicken breast, cooked: 100 g · Pork chop, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    209 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    25.61 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    11.06 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.52 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    55 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    344 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.79 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    25 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Pork chop, cooked · Foodatron