Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked4
VS
Quail, cooked
Quail, cooked3

Chicken breast, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Chicken breast, cooked: 100 g · Quail, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Quail, cooked for less sodium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    227 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    25.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    14.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.96 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    52 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    216 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    4.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Quail, cooked · Foodatron