Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked3
VS
Salmon, cooked Leader
Salmon, cooked4

Salmon, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Salmon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more iron.

Pick Salmon, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    206 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    22.1 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    12.35 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    2.4 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    61 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    384 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29 mg
    30 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Salmon, cooked · Foodatron