Chicken breast, cooked vs Sweet potato, baked

Chicken breast, cooked4

Leader

Sweet potato, baked6

Sweet potato, baked leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sweet potato, baked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less sugar, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Sweet potato, baked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
165 kcal
90 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN31.02 g
2.01 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
20.71 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
3.3 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
WIN0 g
6.48 g
Total fat
3.57 g
0.15 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.01 g
0.05 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
74 mg
36 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
256 mg
475 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
15 mg
38 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN1.04 mg
0.69 mg
Magnesiummore is better
WIN29 mg
27 mg
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
19.6 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.