Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked2
VS
Tempeh Leader
Tempeh5

Tempeh leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Tempeh comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Tempeh for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    192 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    20.29 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    7.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    10.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    2.54 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    9 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    412 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    111 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    2.7 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29 mg
    81 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Tempeh · Foodatron