Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked5
VS
Turkey breast, cooked
Turkey breast, cooked2

Chicken breast, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    30.13 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    2.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.01 g
    0.59 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN74 mg
    99 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    249 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Turkey breast, cooked · Foodatron