Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked Leader
Chicken breast, cooked6
VS
Turkey breast with skin, roasted
Turkey breast with skin, roasted1

Chicken breast, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Chicken breast, cooked: 100 g · Turkey breast with skin, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

Chicken breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey breast with skin, roasted for less saturated fat.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    126 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    22.16 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    3.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.01 g
    0.98 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN74 mg
    397 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    248 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN15 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.04 mg
    0.66 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Turkey breast with skin, roasted · Foodatron