Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, cooked
Chicken breast, cooked3
VS
Turkey wing, cooked Leader
Turkey wing, cooked4

Turkey wing, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Turkey wing, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey wing, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    165 kcal
    229 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN31.02 g
    27.38 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.57 g
    12.43 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.01 g
    3.39 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    74 mg
    61 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    256 mg
    266 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    15 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.04 mg
    1.46 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN29 mg
    25 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, cooked vs Turkey wing, cooked · Foodatron