Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw Leader
Chicken breast, raw4
VS
Chicken breast with skin, roasted
Chicken breast with skin, roasted3

Chicken breast, raw leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, raw comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    197 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    29.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    7.78 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    2.19 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    71 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN334 mg
    245 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    1.07 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN28 mg
    27 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Chicken breast with skin, roasted · Foodatron