Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw2
VS
Chicken gizzards, cooked Leader
Chicken gizzards, cooked5

Chicken gizzards, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken gizzards, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken gizzards, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    18.75 g
    19.73 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.18 g
    1.74 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.47 g
    0.44 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    37.5 mg
    36.36 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN278.33 mg
    116.23 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    4.17 mg
    11.04 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.31 mg
    2.07 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN23.33 mg
    1.95 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Chicken gizzards, cooked · Foodatron