Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw Leader
Chicken breast, raw6
VS
Duck breast, cooked
Duck breast, cooked2

Chicken breast, raw leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, raw comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Duck breast, cooked for more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    123 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN22.5 g
    19.85 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    4.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    1.32 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    57 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN334 mg
    268 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN5 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    4.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN28 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    6.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Duck breast, cooked · Foodatron