Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw2
VS
Ground chicken, cooked Leader
Ground chicken, cooked4

Ground chicken, cooked leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Ground chicken, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Ground chicken, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    189 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    23.28 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    10.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    3.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    75 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    334 mg
    677 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    5 mg
    8 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    0.93 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    28 mg
    28 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Ground chicken, cooked · Foodatron