Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw3
VS
Pheasant, cooked Leader
Pheasant, cooked5

Pheasant, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Chicken breast, raw: 100 g · Pheasant, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Pheasant, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Pheasant, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    239 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    32.4 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    12.1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    3.91 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    45 mg
    43 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN334 mg
    271 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5 mg
    16 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    1.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN28 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    2.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Pheasant, cooked · Foodatron