Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw3
VS
Turkey breast, cooked Leader
Turkey breast, cooked4

Turkey breast, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Turkey breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for more protein, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    30.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    2.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    0.59 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    99 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN334 mg
    249 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5 mg
    9 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    0.71 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    28 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Turkey breast, cooked · Foodatron