Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw
Chicken breast, raw3
VS
Turkey breast, raw Leader
Turkey breast, raw4

Turkey breast, raw leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Turkey breast, raw comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less sugar, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Turkey breast, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    114 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    23.66 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.14 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.05 g
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    1.48 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.56 g
    0.29 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    113 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN334 mg
    242 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    0.73 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    28 mg
    28 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Turkey breast, raw · Foodatron