Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast, raw Leader
Chicken breast, raw5
VS
Turkey thigh, cooked
Turkey thigh, cooked2

Chicken breast, raw leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey thigh, cooked for more protein and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    120 kcal
    159 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    22.5 g
    25.14 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.46 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.62 g
    6.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.56 g
    2.02 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN45 mg
    104 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN334 mg
    296 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN5 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    1.59 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN28 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast, raw vs Turkey thigh, cooked · Foodatron