Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted6
VS
Chicken, meat and skin, roasted
Chicken, meat and skin, roasted1

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken, meat and skin, roasted for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN15.13 g
    11.42 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.95 g
    5.69 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.11 g
    1.59 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    36.04 mg
    34.31 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN124.37 mg
    93.31 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN7.11 mg
    6.28 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.54 mg
    0.53 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN13.71 mg
    9.62 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast with skin, roasted vs Chicken, meat and skin, roasted · Foodatron