Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted
Chicken breast with skin, roasted3
VS
Duck breast, cooked Leader
Duck breast, cooked5

Duck breast, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Duck breast, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Duck breast, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    197 kcal
    123 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.8 g
    19.85 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    7.78 g
    4.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    1.32 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    71 mg
    57 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    245 mg
    268 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.07 mg
    4.51 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN27 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    6.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast with skin, roasted vs Duck breast, cooked · Foodatron