Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted5
VS
Ground chicken, cooked
Ground chicken, cooked2

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Ground chicken, cooked for more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    197 kcal
    189 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.8 g
    23.28 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    7.78 g
    10.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.19 g
    3.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN71 mg
    75 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    245 mg
    677 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    8 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.07 mg
    0.93 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    27 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast with skin, roasted vs Ground chicken, cooked · Foodatron