Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted5
VS
Turkey breast with skin, roasted
Turkey breast with skin, roasted2

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey breast with skin, roasted for less saturated fat and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    197 kcal
    126 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.8 g
    22.16 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    7.78 g
    3.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    0.98 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN71 mg
    397 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    245 mg
    248 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.07 mg
    0.66 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN27 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.