Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted5
VS
Turkey neck, cooked
Turkey neck, cooked2

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey neck, cooked for more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    197 kcal
    162 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.8 g
    22.48 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    7.78 g
    7.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.19 g
    2.22 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN71 mg
    246 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN245 mg
    114 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    14 mg
    58 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.07 mg
    1.18 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN27 mg
    18 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast with skin, roasted vs Turkey neck, cooked · Foodatron