Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken breast with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken breast with skin, roasted4
VS
Turkey thigh, cooked
Turkey thigh, cooked3

Chicken breast with skin, roasted leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken breast with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken breast with skin, roasted for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey thigh, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    197 kcal
    159 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.8 g
    25.14 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.46 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    7.78 g
    6.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.19 g
    2.02 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN71 mg
    104 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    245 mg
    296 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.07 mg
    1.59 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN27 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken breast with skin, roasted vs Turkey thigh, cooked · Foodatron