Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chickpeas, cooked
Chickpeas, cooked3
VS
Edamame, cooked Leader
Edamame, cooked7

Edamame, cooked leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Edamame, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat and more iron.

Pick Edamame, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    164 kcal
    121 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    8.86 g
    11.91 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    27.42 g
    8.91 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN7.6 g
    5.2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    4.8 g
    2.18 gWIN
  • Total fat
    2.59 g
    5.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.27 g
    0.62 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    7 mg
    6 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    291 mg
    436 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    49 mg
    63 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.89 mg
    2.27 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    48 mg
    64 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.3 mg
    6.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chickpeas, cooked vs Edamame, cooked · Foodatron