Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chickpeas, cooked Leader
Chickpeas, cooked6
VS
Salmon, cooked
Salmon, cooked4

Chickpeas, cooked leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Salmon, cooked for more protein, less sugar, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    164 kcal
    206 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    8.86 g
    22.1 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    27.42 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN7.6 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    4.8 g
    0 gWIN
  • Total fat
    2.59 g
    12.35 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.27 g
    2.4 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN7 mg
    61 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    291 mg
    384 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.89 mg
    0.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.3 mg
    3.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chickpeas, cooked vs Salmon, cooked · Foodatron