Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Chickpeas, cooked Leader
Chickpeas, cooked6
VS
Yellowfin tuna, cooked
Yellowfin tuna, cooked4

Chickpeas, cooked leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpeas, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chickpeas, cooked for more fiber, less sodium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat and more potassium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    164 kcal
    130 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    8.86 g
    29.15 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    27.42 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN7.6 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    4.8 g
    0 gWIN
  • Total fat
    2.59 g
    0.59 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.27 g
    0.21 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN7 mg
    54 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    291 mg
    527 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.89 mg
    0.92 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chickpeas, cooked vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked · Foodatron