Cusk, cooked leads 2–0 · 2 categories decided · 2 ties
Each value is per 100 g edible portion.
The verdict
Cusk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 2 of 2 nutrient match-ups.
Pick Cusk, cooked for more protein and less sodium.
Evenly matched on fiber and iron.
Head-to-head
- Energy112 kcal126.76 kcal
- Proteinmore is betterWIN24.35 g23.24 g
- Carbohydrate0 g0 g
- Fibermore is better0 g0 g
- Total sugarsless is better—0 g
- Total fat0.88 g3.52 g
- Saturated fatless is better—1.06 g
- Sodiumless is betterWIN40 mg218.31 mg
- Potassiummore is better503 mg—
- Calciummore is better13 mg—
- Ironmore is better1.06 mg1.06 mg
- Magnesiummore is better40 mg—
- Vitamin Cmore is better0 mg—
- Vitamin Dmore is better——
Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.
