Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate

Sliced Chicken leads 4–1 Β· 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sliced Chicken comes out ahead, winning 4 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Sliced Chicken for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick 6 Sausage Rashers for less sugar.

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    115 kcal
    146.52 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN23.33 g
    20 g
  • Carbohydrate
    1.5 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN0.5 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.83 g
    0 gWIN
  • Total fat
    1.67 g
    7.17 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.5 g
    2.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN230 mg
    1347.83 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    β€”
    β€”
  • Calciummore is better
    β€”
    β€”
  • Ironmore is better
    β€”
    β€”
  • Magnesiummore is better
    β€”
    β€”
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    β€”
    β€”
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    β€”
    β€”

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing β‰  zero). Educational information only β€” not medical advice.

Sliced Chicken vs 6 Sausage Rashers Β· Foodatron