Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Edamame, cooked Leader
Edamame, cooked5
VS
Pinto beans, cooked
Pinto beans, cooked4

Edamame, cooked leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Edamame, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Edamame, cooked for more protein, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Pinto beans, cooked for more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Evenly matched on potassium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    121 kcal
    143 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN11.91 g
    9.01 g
  • Carbohydrate
    8.91 g
    26.22 g
  • Fibermore is better
    5.2 g
    9 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    2.18 g
    0.34 gWIN
  • Total fat
    5.2 g
    0.65 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.62 g
    0.14 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    436 mg
    436 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN63 mg
    46 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.27 mg
    2.09 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN64 mg
    50 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN6.1 mg
    0.8 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Edamame, cooked vs Pinto beans, cooked · Foodatron