Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Leader
Naked Wafer Thin Ham Slices4
VS
10 Lunchbox Minis1

Naked Wafer Thin Ham Slices leads 4–1 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Naked Wafer Thin Ham Slices comes out ahead, winning 4 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Naked Wafer Thin Ham Slices for more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick 10 Lunchbox Minis for more protein.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    89 kcal
    250 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    18.5 g
    23 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    1.2 g
    2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN0.5 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.2 g
    2 g
  • Total fat
    1.7 g
    44 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.6 g
    18 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN566 mg
    1640 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    —
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Naked Wafer Thin Ham Slices vs 10 Lunchbox Minis · Foodatron