Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Leader
Ancient Grains Probiotic Granola4
VS
Original Ancient Grain Granola3

Ancient Grains Probiotic Granola leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Ancient Grains Probiotic Granola comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Ancient Grains Probiotic Granola for more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Original Ancient Grain Granola for more protein, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    454.55 kcal
    433.33 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    9.09 g
    10 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    70.91 g
    60 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN10.91 g
    6.67 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN16.36 g
    20 g
  • Total fat
    16.36 g
    16.67 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.73 g
    11.67 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN436.36 mg
    450 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    90.91 mg
    100 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    3.27 mg
    3.33 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Ancient Grains Probiotic Granola vs Original Ancient Grain Granola · Foodatron